A couple years ago I wrote this 'screed' on trauma informed care (TIC) models. My concerns at the time were related to the lack of direct intervention that was promoted as part of this model - and that it appeared that some OTs were adopting a social work approach to the issue.
Last night there was an #OTalk2Us twitter conversation about these models; I was not able to participate but I have been studying the conversation. I think that this is a good opportunity to see if we are progressing ideas on TIC to be more occupational therapy directed and intervention-focused.
It was good to see more conversation around the areas of occupational therapy assessment and intervention. I think that we still need some direct conversation about how this problem gets addressed from an intervention perspective. In my local experience, most of the conversation around TIC models is still oriented toward 'awareness' and is being driven by systems-level consultants. I als…
(of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. "reckless driving"
On February 6-7, 2017, AOTA convened an ad hoc committee. This group was charged with the task to explore current experiential requirements for OTs and OTAs.
As a result, the ad hoc group recommended a new model of experiential education that makes several disruptive changes including changes to the length of fieldwork and creation of a post-graduate first year practitioner resident program. Under this plan, graduates would complete the certification examination and practice under a limited license until the residency was completed.
The group identified that this would involve the revision of many state's practice acts. They indicate that they were informed by staff and content experts on implications of these decisions.
However, there were no state regulators listed in the ad hoc group. There were no representatives from the certification…
Early intervention providers in New York State should be aware that when Governor Cuomo does not get what he wants he just tries to cram it down everyone's throat via legislation - repeatedly.
Blogging about the annual attacks on the early intervention program got boring around 3 years ago. At that point in time the State Fiscal Agent (SFA) that is costing the taxpayers of NY millions of dollars in contract fees was only collecting 15% of monies billed for services. In 2016 nearly 85% of claims submitted by the SFA to private insurers were denied.
This is a recurring theme - what should occupational therapists focus on when they are making decisions about services? Should they focus on the people that need services, or should they focus on the amount of money being spent?
This question also applies to the latest situation with the repeal of the Medicare therapy cap and the resultant payment differential that has been applied to OTAs.
When attempting to develop an advocacy position - should the occupational therapy profession measure impact in terms of lives affected or in dollars spent? Here is an analysis of how the professional association is cherry-picking statistics in order to suit their chosen advocacy position.
Perhaps we can call this analysis "A Tale of Two Table Fours"
Here is Table 4 from the Moran Company Report, commissioned by AOTA to look at the Medicare cap issue.
The RED information indicates the numbers of people (beneficiaries) who wer…